Living Inside Google

AI, convenience and the future of human agency

Editor’s Note: Ahead of Google I/O 2026, Saliya Weerakoon reflects on Alphabet’s latest earnings call not simply as a financial event, but as a marker of a broader civilizational shift. His concern is not the familiar fear that artificial intelligence will become too powerful. It is the quieter possibility that human beings may surrender too much of their own agency, memory and imagination in exchange for convenience.

I was 23 years old when I received my first personal email address. Like millions entering the early internet age, I began with Yahoo and Hotmail. Back then, an email address felt almost ceremonial, a small digital passport into a new world. You chose it carefully, memorised passwords and waited patiently for dial-up connections. The internet still carried friction.

Then, in 2004, I moved to Gmail. At the time, it felt less like changing an email provider and more like stepping quietly into the future ahead of everyone else. Google had not yet become the giant it would later become, though there was already a strange confidence surrounding it. The interface was clean. The speed felt different. The architecture itself felt intelligent long before artificial intelligence became fashionable language.

Twenty-two years later, I rarely hear anyone speak about Yahoo or Hotmail anymore. One baby boomer friend still uses an AOL address, like an old photograph on the wall of an ancestral home. The world moved on. More importantly, the world moved into Google.

From Search Engine to Environment

On April 29, 2026, during Alphabet’s first-quarter earnings call, Sundar Pichai stood calmly before the world and narrated the next stage of technological civilisation through financial results. Rumours had circulated not long ago about the possible end of his tenure. Yet there he was again, composed and measured, speaking less like a corporate executive and more like the steward of a rapidly expanding ecosystem touching billions of lives every hour.

Google Services revenues increased 16% to $89.6 billion, led by 19% growth in Google Search & other, 19% growth in subscriptions, platforms and devices, and 11% growth in YouTube ads. Google Cloud revenue accelerated by 63%, reaching $20.0 billion, while Alphabet’s consolidated revenues rose 22% to $109.9 billion. Sundar Pichai also noted that Google’s paid subscriptions had reached 350 million, led by YouTube and Google One, while Nano Banana 2 reached one billion generated images in nearly half the time of Nano Banana 1. He spoke about agents, agentic coding, autonomous systems and the next frontier of intelligence.

To investors, these were extraordinary numbers. To me, they sounded like signals of something much deeper unfolding beneath the quarterly reporting cycle. This story is larger than Larry Page, Sergey Brin or Pichai himself. It extends far beyond another predictable apocalypse narrative surrounding artificial intelligence.

AI is here to stay. It will improve medicine, optimise traffic, reduce waste, personalise education, accelerate scientific discovery and possibly help prevent future conflicts. Every technological revolution in history has carried both advancement and consequence. Human beings eventually adapt to both. The machines are not evil. Corporations are rarely as simple as heroes or villains. Human beings themselves have always defined good and bad through lived experience, fear, ambition and survival.

The true antagonist is far quieter. It is the gradual surrender of human agency in exchange for frictionless existence. Human beings have always loved delegation. I am human, vulnerable, and I love delegation.

The Seduction of Convenience

We delegated farming to machines, navigation to GPS, memory to smartphones and attention to algorithms. Slowly and almost beautifully, humanity is now beginning to delegate thought itself. That was not something I wanted to give away completely.

The world is in a reconfiguration, but the transition does not arrive dramatically. The surrender arrives through convenience, comfort and efficiency. History shows that the deepest civilisational shifts rarely arrive through force. They arrive through seduction: the seduction of rewards, results, hope, fear, jealousy and optimisation.

Listening carefully to Pichai’s earnings call, I realised the deeper strength of the Google ecosystem is not technological dominance alone. Its true power lies in behavioural integration. Google no longer exists merely as a company people use. It is becoming an environment people inhabit. I understand this personally. Eventually, if I move deeper into Google’s health devices and hardware, I would touch the Google ecosystem every second of life, even in sleep.

Search thinks alongside you. Maps guide movement. Gemini writes and summarises. YouTube studies psychology through patterns of attention. Android follows movement through daily life. Google Photos remembers moments with greater consistency than human memory itself. Workspace increasingly organises professional cognition. Most people no longer remember phone numbers. Many struggle to travel without navigation systems. Birthdays, memories, schedules, conversations and even moments of silence increasingly pass through digital mediation first. The ecosystem no longer sits outside human experience. It increasingly positions itself between the human being and reality.

That is where the real question begins: what happens when human beings remove every difficulty required to remain human?

What Friction Teaches

Growing up, my parents taught me something modern systems increasingly avoid. Friction mattered. Failure mattered. Waiting mattered. I was four years old when I first learned to write words on a small tablet-sized blackboard with white chalk. The handwriting was imperfect. The process was slow. Learning required repetition, embarrassment, boredom and failure.

Natural intelligence emerged through struggle: through reading countless books whose meanings only became clear years later; through demanding teachers, examination failures, workplace betrayals, uncertain decisions and painful consequences. It emerged through frustration, silence, heartbreak and long periods when answers refused to arrive quickly. As a child, I learned imagination through boredom. Today, stimulation arrives before silence has a chance to speak.

Real intelligence was never frictionless. It was forged slowly through resistance.

When Assistance Becomes Dependency

Today, an entirely different architecture is emerging. A child uncomfortable with boredom reaches immediately for stimulation. A student facing difficulty summons AI assistance before wrestling with uncertainty. A politician models speeches through predictive systems. A CEO increasingly relies on machine-generated strategic interpretation rather than instinct formed through lived consequence.

At first glance, this appears like remarkable progress. In many ways, it truly is. Cities may become cleaner. We may end up with calmer traffic, predictive healthcare, lower crime rates, optimised nutrition and wars mediated by intelligent systems capable of simulating outcomes beyond human processing speed. Human civilisation may eventually become astonishingly efficient.

People will embrace this world because human beings naturally prefer comfort over difficulty. Speed, optimisation and predictive certainty create emotional reassurance. Frictionless systems feel safe. Yet beneath optimisation, another process quietly unfolds. Human tolerance for ambiguity weakens. Patience deteriorates. Memory externalises. Instinct dulls. Independent imagination narrows. Creativity risks becoming synthetic recombination rather than lived originality.

Even suffering, one of humanity’s oldest teachers, slowly loses relevance inside predictive systems designed to minimise discomfort before it appears. The danger is not artificial intelligence becoming excessively intelligent. The deeper danger is natural intelligence becoming increasingly unnecessary.

History repeatedly shows that human capacities left unused eventually disappear. This is why the future conversation cannot remain limited to innovation, regulation or corporate competition. The deeper conversation concerns preserving human depth within intelligent systems.

Preserving Human Depth

Humanity does not need to reject AI. Fear alone will solve nothing. The challenge is resisting complete surrender. There is a difference between assistance and dependency. There is a difference between optimisation and meaning. There is a difference between reducing friction and removing the conditions necessary for human growth itself.

Ironically, the more perfect systems become, the more imperfect human beings may quietly feel within them. A civilisation may soon know everything instantly, yet understand itself less deeply than ever before. Living inside Google may be the deeper reality unfolding beneath the product launches, quarterly numbers and extraordinary technological breakthroughs.

The world does not lack intelligence. It is screaming for orientation and purpose.

---