👥 Panel Recap: Crisis in the Middle East (June 16, 2025)
All options on the table
June 16, 2025
Hosted by econVue, a trusted space to explore high-stakes geopolitical dynamics.
Our panel discussion was led by economist Karim Pakravan. We were joined by econVue Fellow and defense analyst Eleanor Hughes, and human capital expert Kathleen Graham—along with a group of subscribers representing a wide array of viewpoints and experience.
Executive Summary
The group examined the escalating crisis in the Middle East—especially the confrontation between Israel and Iran—and its broader economic, political, and historical implications. Topics ranged from energy market volatility and the feasibility of regime change in Iran to the psychological dimensions of crisis leadership and global investor complacency. Perspectives spanned macroeconomic forecasting, historical analogies, field experience, and national security strategy. Despite diverging views, panelists agreed on one point: the world stands at a dangerous inflection point, with the Middle East as a potential flashpoint for far greater disruption.
↳ 10 Things You Need to Know
1. Energy Market Scenarios
Participants discussed three potential outcomes for global oil markets:
A baseline scenario with minimal disruption
A conflict scenario involving targeted strikes on infrastructure
A regional escalation scenario involving U.S. intervention
Despite geopolitical uncertainty, energy markets appear to be pricing in only the least-disruptive possibility.
2. Economic Costs of Conflict
It was noted that military expenditures are placing significant pressure on national budgets. The long-term economic toll of sustained operations—both direct and indirect—raises important strategic and political considerations for all actors involved.
3. Financial Market Complacency
The group explored why markets remain buoyant despite escalating global tensions. Possible explanations include momentum-driven trading behavior, underappreciation of geopolitical risk, and distortions created by algorithmic trading and retail investor activity.
4. Prospects for Regime Change in Iran
Discussion emphasized that effective regime change historically requires internal actors—military, political, or social—to play a decisive role. External calls for popular uprising were viewed as overly optimistic, with participants expressing skepticism that such efforts could succeed in the current climate.
5. Challenges of Post-Regime Scenarios
There was deep concern about the viability of opposition groups and political alternatives. Some argued that replacing the current regime could lead to even greater instability, especially if new actors lack legitimacy, cohesion, or governance capacity.
6. Strategic Influence of China
Attention turned to China’s expanding economic footprint in the Middle East and beyond. Several participants drew parallels to other regions where infrastructure investment and elite capture have extended Chinese influence, potentially complicating Western policy responses.
7. Military Strategy and Long-Term Goals
Some perspectives suggested that the current military actions in the region may be part of a broader strategic effort to neutralize threats deemed existential. These efforts appear to be long-term in scope and are proceeding regardless of short-term economic costs.
8. The Role of Leadership and Personality
The discussion highlighted how the personalities of key decision-makers—and their interpersonal dynamics—can shape the outcomes of crises in unpredictable ways. Historical examples were used to underscore the importance of restraint, communication, and leadership under pressure.
9. Humanitarian and Moral Dimensions
A recurring theme was the human cost of conflict. Participants reflected on past experiences in war zones and stressed the need to consider not only strategic outcomes but also the long-term impact on civilian populations and regional stability.
10. Risks of Escalation
Finally, the group discussed the potential for accidental escalation, particularly involving U.S. forces. Even a limited incident could shift the trajectory of the conflict. Concerns were raised about the fragility of deterrence and the importance of crisis management mechanisms.
↳ Panelists
📍Chicago
📍Chicago
📍Washington
↳Moderated by
Editor-in-Chief
💬 Want to be in the room next time? Recordings are not available for our not-for attribution panels, in order to allow for a frank and open exchange of views.
They are open to econVue subscribers only—explore membership options here:
↳ Recent posts by econVue experts
Unintended Human Capital Consequences
💬 The unintended consequences—positive or negative—of people simply being human should always be considered a given.
↳ Historical Context
US Policy Failures in Iran: In 1980, President Richard Nixon traveled to Cairo to attend the funeral of the Shah of Iran, the only foreign dignitary of any rank to pay his respects in person. He believed that President Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy towards Iran was a grave mistake. In this interview, President Nixon explained why he believed abandoning the Shah of Iran cost the US dearly: A Tragedy for Iran and the Middle East: Video, Nixon Foundation.
The Shah’s Missteps: Political scientist Marvin Zonis of the University of Chicago, had another view of the Shah, and his rule:
“His grandiosity, his Persepolis celebration, his apparent disdain for the Iranian people, the absurd pretensions of monarchy, the inequality, the corruption of the court, the abuse of human rights.
—2018 Interview with the Tehran Times about Zonis’s book, Majestic Failure: The Fall of the Shah (1991).
↳ Related Commentary
Israel’s attacks on Iran may lead to regime collapse, chaos: Trita Parsi, The Hill, June 18, 2025.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Council on Foreign Relations Explainer, The IRGC is one of the most powerful organizations in Iran, conceived as the principal defender of the 1979 revolution, and now a critical link to Islamist militant groups violently opposed to Israel and the United States.
Lyric Hughes Hale and Pippa Malmgren debate on X: (link)
